Upcoming Police Misconduct Hearings 27 May 2022 – 9 Jun 2022

View as PDF / Download / Print

5-Day Summary

Fri 27th May 2022, (time not published) (Location unknown)

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Fri 27th May 2022, 10:00am BTP Force Headquarters, Camden Road, London, NW1

Chief Inspector Paul Crouch     –     British Transport Police,

The allegations are that:

Whilst on duty, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexual comments to a colleague in relation to a serious sexual assault and/or rape that had taken place involving a minor.
Whilst on duty and in conversation with a colleague, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexist comments about a newly promoted senior officer.
On an unknown date in 2021, in separate conversations with colleagues whilst on duty, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexual comments about a senior officer.
CI Crouch kept a list of whom he considered to be the “top ten fittest women” he worked with, and that the Officer had written the word “list” on a post-it note and placed it visible to colleagues. On a number of occasions CI Crouch would “tap” the post-it note when one of the women walked past, and on a number of occasions would wink at another colleague, Ms A, whilst doing this, and made repeated other references to such a “list”. The keeping of such a list created a sexualised work environment and was sexist behaviour.
Between 2019 and 2021, CI Crouch made repeated inappropriate sexual comments to a colleague, and intended to demean, embarrass, and undermine the colleague. This behaviour was motivated on the grounds of sex and it is alleged that this amounted to sexual discrimination against the Officer’s colleague.
On unknown dates but approximately 2011 – 2012 and/or 2018-2021, CI Crouch used inappropriate and sexual behaviour towards a female colleague, Ms B, whilst on duty.
Between approximately 2013 – 2014, CI Crouch had pictures of women next to his desk in view of colleagues, including Ms B. This behaviour was inappropriate and sexual and created a sexualised working environment.
CI Crouch, whilst on duty, made inappropriate and sexist comments regarding the promotion of a female colleague.

Sat 28th May 2022, (time not published) (Location unknown)

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Sun 29th May 2022, (time not published) (Location unknown)

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 30th May 2022, (time not published) (Location unknown)

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 30th May 2022, 9:30am Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

PC Jamie Pamplin     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

It is alleged that on 26 December 2020 whilst responding to an urgent assistance call, PC Jamie Pamplin drove a marked police vehicle, namely a BMW 5-series estate car, for four minutes in excess of the speed limit when he had no authority to do so.

Mon 30th May 2022, 10:00am Tribunal Rooms, Empress State Building

PC Matthew Nastri     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

It is alleged that former PC Matthew Nastri stopped and searched a male without having any genuine or objectively reasonable grounds to do so. Furthermore he used force on the male that was not necessary, proportionate or reasonable in all the circumstances in order to detain him.

Tue 31st May 2022, (time not published) (Location unknown)

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Tue 31st May 2022, 9:30am Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

PC Jamie Pamplin     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

It is alleged that on 26 December 2020 whilst responding to an urgent assistance call, PC Jamie Pamplin drove a marked police vehicle, namely a BMW 5-series estate car, for four minutes in excess of the speed limit when he had no authority to do so.

Tue 31st May 2022, 10:00am Tribunal Rooms, Empress State Building

PC Matthew Nastri     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

It is alleged that former PC Matthew Nastri stopped and searched a male without having any genuine or objectively reasonable grounds to do so. Furthermore he used force on the male that was not necessary, proportionate or reasonable in all the circumstances in order to detain him.

Tue 31st May 2022, 9:30am The Piazza hearing suite, Empress State building

Former PC Swaleh Chaudhry     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

On 1 April 2022 at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court former PC Chaudhry pleaded guilty to;

one count of possessing an extreme pornographic image portraying an act of intercourse/oral sex with a dead or alive animal
contrary to Sec 63(1), 7(d) & 67(3) Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
one count of voyeurism – recording a private act without another’s consent for the purposes of sexual gratification
contrary to Sec 67(3) & (5) Sexual Offences Act 2003
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category A)
contrary to Sec 1 (1) (a) & Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category B)
contrary to Sec 1(1) (a) & Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category C)
contrary to Sec 1(1)(a) and Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
The particulars being:

On 30 March 2022 former PC Swaleh Chaudhry was arrested in a high street clothing store after having been detained in the mixed-sex changing rooms. He was suspected of having used his mobile phone to film a female under the partition of a private changing cubicle whilst she was undressing.

On 31 March 2022, during a premises search, digital devices were seized belonging to former PC Chaudhry which contained indecent images of children and extreme pornography.

Former PC Chaudhry subsequently pleaded guilty to the offences he was charged with.

In all respects the Appropriate Authority therefore considers former PC Chaudhry’s actions to be a breach of the following Standards of Professional Behaviour:

Discreditable Conduct

Hearings List (14 days)

Fri 27th May 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Fri 27th May 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Chief Inspector Paul Crouch     –     British Transport Police,

BTP Force Headquarters, Camden Road, London, NW1

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Equality and diversity
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

The allegations are that:

Whilst on duty, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexual comments to a colleague in relation to a serious sexual assault and/or rape that had taken place involving a minor.
Whilst on duty and in conversation with a colleague, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexist comments about a newly promoted senior officer.
On an unknown date in 2021, in separate conversations with colleagues whilst on duty, CI Crouch made inappropriate sexual comments about a senior officer.
CI Crouch kept a list of whom he considered to be the “top ten fittest women” he worked with, and that the Officer had written the word “list” on a post-it note and placed it visible to colleagues. On a number of occasions CI Crouch would “tap” the post-it note when one of the women walked past, and on a number of occasions would wink at another colleague, Ms A, whilst doing this, and made repeated other references to such a “list”. The keeping of such a list created a sexualised work environment and was sexist behaviour.
Between 2019 and 2021, CI Crouch made repeated inappropriate sexual comments to a colleague, and intended to demean, embarrass, and undermine the colleague. This behaviour was motivated on the grounds of sex and it is alleged that this amounted to sexual discrimination against the Officer’s colleague.
On unknown dates but approximately 2011 – 2012 and/or 2018-2021, CI Crouch used inappropriate and sexual behaviour towards a female colleague, Ms B, whilst on duty.
Between approximately 2013 – 2014, CI Crouch had pictures of women next to his desk in view of colleagues, including Ms B. This behaviour was inappropriate and sexual and created a sexualised working environment.
CI Crouch, whilst on duty, made inappropriate and sexist comments regarding the promotion of a female colleague.

Sat 28th May 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Sun 29th May 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 30th May 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 30th May 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Jamie Pamplin     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Orders and instructions

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that on 26 December 2020 whilst responding to an urgent assistance call, PC Jamie Pamplin drove a marked police vehicle, namely a BMW 5-series estate car, for four minutes in excess of the speed limit when he had no authority to do so.

Mon 30th May 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Matthew Nastri     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

Tribunal Rooms, Empress State Building

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Duties and responsibilities

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that former PC Matthew Nastri stopped and searched a male without having any genuine or objectively reasonable grounds to do so. Furthermore he used force on the male that was not necessary, proportionate or reasonable in all the circumstances in order to detain him.

Tue 31st May 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Tue 31st May 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Jamie Pamplin     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Orders and instructions

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that on 26 December 2020 whilst responding to an urgent assistance call, PC Jamie Pamplin drove a marked police vehicle, namely a BMW 5-series estate car, for four minutes in excess of the speed limit when he had no authority to do so.

Tue 31st May 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Matthew Nastri     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

Tribunal Rooms, Empress State Building

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Duties and responsibilities

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that former PC Matthew Nastri stopped and searched a male without having any genuine or objectively reasonable grounds to do so. Furthermore he used force on the male that was not necessary, proportionate or reasonable in all the circumstances in order to detain him.

Tue 31st May 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

Former PC Swaleh Chaudhry     –     Metropolitan Police Service,

The Piazza hearing suite, Empress State building

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 1 April 2022 at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court former PC Chaudhry pleaded guilty to;

one count of possessing an extreme pornographic image portraying an act of intercourse/oral sex with a dead or alive animal
contrary to Sec 63(1), 7(d) & 67(3) Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
one count of voyeurism – recording a private act without another’s consent for the purposes of sexual gratification
contrary to Sec 67(3) & (5) Sexual Offences Act 2003
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category A)
contrary to Sec 1 (1) (a) & Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category B)
contrary to Sec 1(1) (a) & Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
one count of making an indecent photograph of a child (Category C)
contrary to Sec 1(1)(a) and Sec 6 Protection of Children Act 1978
The particulars being:

On 30 March 2022 former PC Swaleh Chaudhry was arrested in a high street clothing store after having been detained in the mixed-sex changing rooms. He was suspected of having used his mobile phone to film a female under the partition of a private changing cubicle whilst she was undressing.

On 31 March 2022, during a premises search, digital devices were seized belonging to former PC Chaudhry which contained indecent images of children and extreme pornography.

Former PC Chaudhry subsequently pleaded guilty to the offences he was charged with.

In all respects the Appropriate Authority therefore considers former PC Chaudhry’s actions to be a breach of the following Standards of Professional Behaviour:

Discreditable Conduct

Wed 1st June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Thu 2nd June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Fri 3rd June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Sat 4th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Sun 5th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 6th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Officer A and B     –     Kent Police,

Clift Suite, Kent Police Force Headquarters, Thames Way, Northfleet, Gravesend, Kent

Alleged Breaches

  • Honesty and integrity
  • Confidentiality
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

During the period when Officer B was released under investigation, it is alleged that there was ongoing contact between Officer A and Officer B, despite both officers having been told not to contact each other. Supervising officers were, it is alleged, dishonestly misled about the communications that had taken place between Officer A and Officer B.

It is also alleged that Officer A accessed the custody record of Officer B for a non-policing purpose, took a photograph of the custody record and showed this to another officer.

Officer A is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and integrity
confidentiality
discreditable conduct
challenging and reporting improper conduct
Officer B is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and Integrity
orders and instructions
discreditable conduct

Mon 6th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Mon 6th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC 4823 Hafeez Javeed     –     Thames Valley Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that on 11 August 2020, whilst PC Javeed was on duty at a police station, he touched a member of staff (Miss A) inappropriately without her consent.

Tue 7th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Officer A and B     –     Kent Police,

Clift Suite, Kent Police Force Headquarters, Thames Way, Northfleet, Gravesend, Kent

Alleged Breaches

  • Honesty and integrity
  • Confidentiality
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

During the period when Officer B was released under investigation, it is alleged that there was ongoing contact between Officer A and Officer B, despite both officers having been told not to contact each other. Supervising officers were, it is alleged, dishonestly misled about the communications that had taken place between Officer A and Officer B.

It is also alleged that Officer A accessed the custody record of Officer B for a non-policing purpose, took a photograph of the custody record and showed this to another officer.

Officer A is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and integrity
confidentiality
discreditable conduct
challenging and reporting improper conduct
Officer B is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and Integrity
orders and instructions
discreditable conduct

Tue 7th June 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC 252745 Paige Hardiman     –     Gloucestershire Constabulary,

Police Headquarters, Gloucester

Alleged Breaches

  • Honesty and integrity

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Allegation 1
The officer is alleged to have informed her supervisor
that she had notified her insurer of modifications to
her vehicle when this was not true.
Allegation 2
The officer is alleged to have spoken further to her
supervisor regarding the modifications to her vehicle
and showed her supervisor her mobile telephone
which displayed information from her insurer which
appeared to confirm her earlier verbal account that
her insurer was aware of the modifications to her
vehicle. It is alleged the officer was seeking to
further mislead her supervisor as she failed to inform
him that during the previous 20 minutes and only after
her first conversation with him, had she updated her
insurance policy.
Allegation 3
The officer is alleged to have sent her supervisor a
screenshot of her insurance policy confirming that her
insurers were aware of the modifications to her
vehicle. It is alleged the officer failed to make known
to her supervisor that she had only updated or
amended her policy that morning and not months
before as her supervisor believed the position to be
following his previous conversations with the officer.
Allegation 4
The officer is alleged to have again informed her
supervisor that the vehicle was correctly insured and
denied that she had only updated her insurers with
Page 2 of 2
the information regarding the modifications after she
had received a query from an Inspector. It is alleged
the officer lied.
Allegation 5
It is alleged that the officer assured her supervisor
that an email he had prepared was factually correct
concerning the content of the earlier conversation
between them. The contents of the email were false
and inaccurate. It is alleged the officer lied to her
supervisor when she verbally confirmed to him that
the contents of the email were true and accurate.

Tue 7th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Tue 7th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC 4823 Hafeez Javeed     –     Thames Valley Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that on 11 August 2020, whilst PC Javeed was on duty at a police station, he touched a member of staff (Miss A) inappropriately without her consent.

Wed 8th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Officer A and B     –     Kent Police,

Clift Suite, Kent Police Force Headquarters, Thames Way, Northfleet, Gravesend, Kent

Alleged Breaches

  • Honesty and integrity
  • Confidentiality
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

During the period when Officer B was released under investigation, it is alleged that there was ongoing contact between Officer A and Officer B, despite both officers having been told not to contact each other. Supervising officers were, it is alleged, dishonestly misled about the communications that had taken place between Officer A and Officer B.

It is also alleged that Officer A accessed the custody record of Officer B for a non-policing purpose, took a photograph of the custody record and showed this to another officer.

Officer A is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and integrity
confidentiality
discreditable conduct
challenging and reporting improper conduct
Officer B is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and Integrity
orders and instructions
discreditable conduct

Wed 8th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Wed 8th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC 4823 Hafeez Javeed     –     Thames Valley Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

It is alleged that on 11 August 2020, whilst PC Javeed was on duty at a police station, he touched a member of staff (Miss A) inappropriately without her consent.

Thu 9th June 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Officer A and B     –     Kent Police,

Clift Suite, Kent Police Force Headquarters, Thames Way, Northfleet, Gravesend, Kent

Alleged Breaches

  • Honesty and integrity
  • Confidentiality
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

During the period when Officer B was released under investigation, it is alleged that there was ongoing contact between Officer A and Officer B, despite both officers having been told not to contact each other. Supervising officers were, it is alleged, dishonestly misled about the communications that had taken place between Officer A and Officer B.

It is also alleged that Officer A accessed the custody record of Officer B for a non-policing purpose, took a photograph of the custody record and showed this to another officer.

Officer A is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and integrity
confidentiality
discreditable conduct
challenging and reporting improper conduct
Officer B is alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour and in particular the standards relating to:

honesty and Integrity
orders and instructions
discreditable conduct

Thu 9th June 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Paul Jackson and PC Paul Locket     –     Greater Manchester Police,

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Use of force
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

It is not currently known whether the hearing is to be held in private or public.

Constable 13400 Jackson will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of Use of Force and Discreditable Behaviour in relation to the detention of a number of members of the public and the use of his police dog between 10 May 2015 and 17 September 2016 contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 namely:

Constable 17573 Lockett will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Discreditable Conduct and Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct as it is alleged that on 14th April 2016 he stood by and failed to challenge PC Jackson’s mistreatment a detainee contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012.

Share this story
Published
Categorised as Mailings

An investigative news agency that uncovers agenda-setting stories from across the UK