Upcoming Police Misconduct Hearings 19 Jan 2022 – 1 Feb 2022

View as PDF / Download / Print

5-Day Summary

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am (Location unknown)

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Wed 19th January 2022, (time not published) Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am Middle Engine Lane Police Station Middle Engine Lane Wallsend NE28 9NT

Police Constable 2907 Pearson     –     Northumbria Police, Constable

On 3 August 2021, the officer was convicted at for driving a motor vehicle whilst over the prescribed limit of alcohol, contrary to section 5 of the Road Traffic Act. The officer was subsequently sentenced to 12 weeks’ custody, suspended for 12 months, a 3-year disqualification, 150 hours community order and a £788 fine.

The officer’s conduct and resultant conviction set out above breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour contained in Schedule 2 to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012, in particular.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am (Location unknown)

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Thu 20th January 2022, (time not published) Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am Worcester

PC Simon Albutt     –     West Mercia Police, Former Officer

No further information has been provided by the force into the circumstances of the alleged breaches.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am (Location unknown)

Former Police Officer Benjamin Sweeney     –     West Yorkshire Police, Constable

On 28th May 2021 Mr Sweeney was the driver of an Audi A4 motor vehicle, which was involved in a road traffic collision on Oldham Road, Ripponden. The Audi A4 left the road having collided with a wall, resulting in the vehicle falling approximately 20-30 feet before coming to rest on its roof.

Following the collision Mr Sweeney was subject to a roadside breath test which indicated that he had 63 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath, the legal limit being 35 milligrams in 100 millilitres of breath.

Due to the nature of the incident, he was transported to the hospital where a sample of blood was taken for analysis to provide an evidential reading, this was examined and contained 108 milligrams of alcohol within 100 millilitres of blood. This being over the legal limit of 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

On 22nd July 2021, Mr Sweeney attended Leeds Magistrates Court where he pleaded guilty and was convicted of Driving a Motor Vehicle whilst Over the Prescribed Limit, and was banned from driving for 18mths as well as been given a curfew

Thu 20th January 2022, (time not published) Undisclosed Location

Police Officer Benjamin Sweeney.     –     West Yorkshire Police, Former Officer

On 28th May 2021, Mr Sweeney was the driver of an Audi A4 motor vehicle, which was involved in a road traffic collision on Oldham Road, Ripponden.

The Audi A4 left the road having collided with a wall, resulting in the vehicle falling approximately 20-30 feet before coming to rest on its roof.  Following the collision Mr Sweeney was subject to a roadside breath test which indicated that he had 63 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath, the legal limit being 35 milligrams in 100 millilitres of breath.

Due to the nature of the incident, he was transported to the hospital where a sample of blood was taken for analysis to provide an evidential reading, this was examined and contained 108 milligrams of alcohol within 100 millilitres of blood. This being over the legal limit of 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

On 22nd July 2021, Mr Sweeney attended Leeds Magistrates Court where he pleaded guilty and was convicted of Driving a Motor Vehicle whilst Over the Prescribed Limit.

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am (Location unknown)

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Fri 21st January 2022, (time not published) Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am Worcester

PC Simon Albutt     –     West Mercia Police, Former Officer

No further information has been provided by the force into the circumstances of the alleged breaches.

Hearings List (14 days)

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in private.

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Directions

It has been determined by the Chair of the hearing that it should be heard in private under regulation 39 of the Police Conduct Regulations 2020. Representations can be made from the public and the press as to why this hearing, or part of this hearing, should be held in public.

Application to Attend

Any representations should be sent to Hearing.Officer@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk by 4pm on Friday 7 January.

Wed 19th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Wed 19th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Police Constable 2907 Pearson     –     Northumbria Police, Constable

Middle Engine Lane Police Station Middle Engine Lane Wallsend NE28 9NT

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 3 August 2021, the officer was convicted at for driving a motor vehicle whilst over the prescribed limit of alcohol, contrary to section 5 of the Road Traffic Act. The officer was subsequently sentenced to 12 weeks’ custody, suspended for 12 months, a 3-year disqualification, 150 hours community order and a £788 fine.

The officer’s conduct and resultant conviction set out above breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour contained in Schedule 2 to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012, in particular.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in private.

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Directions

It has been determined by the Chair of the hearing that it should be heard in private under regulation 39 of the Police Conduct Regulations 2020. Representations can be made from the public and the press as to why this hearing, or part of this hearing, should be held in public.

Application to Attend

Any representations should be sent to Hearing.Officer@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk by 4pm on Friday 7 January.

Thu 20th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Simon Albutt     –     West Mercia Police, Former Officer

Worcester

Alleged Breaches

  • Confidentiality

The hearing is to be held in public.

No further information has been provided by the force into the circumstances of the alleged breaches.

Thu 20th January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Former Police Officer Benjamin Sweeney     –     West Yorkshire Police, Constable

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 28th May 2021 Mr Sweeney was the driver of an Audi A4 motor vehicle, which was involved in a road traffic collision on Oldham Road, Ripponden. The Audi A4 left the road having collided with a wall, resulting in the vehicle falling approximately 20-30 feet before coming to rest on its roof.

Following the collision Mr Sweeney was subject to a roadside breath test which indicated that he had 63 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath, the legal limit being 35 milligrams in 100 millilitres of breath.

Due to the nature of the incident, he was transported to the hospital where a sample of blood was taken for analysis to provide an evidential reading, this was examined and contained 108 milligrams of alcohol within 100 millilitres of blood. This being over the legal limit of 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

On 22nd July 2021, Mr Sweeney attended Leeds Magistrates Court where he pleaded guilty and was convicted of Driving a Motor Vehicle whilst Over the Prescribed Limit, and was banned from driving for 18mths as well as been given a curfew

Thu 20th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

Police Officer Benjamin Sweeney.     –     West Yorkshire Police, Former Officer

Undisclosed Location

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 28th May 2021, Mr Sweeney was the driver of an Audi A4 motor vehicle, which was involved in a road traffic collision on Oldham Road, Ripponden.

The Audi A4 left the road having collided with a wall, resulting in the vehicle falling approximately 20-30 feet before coming to rest on its roof.  Following the collision Mr Sweeney was subject to a roadside breath test which indicated that he had 63 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath, the legal limit being 35 milligrams in 100 millilitres of breath.

Due to the nature of the incident, he was transported to the hospital where a sample of blood was taken for analysis to provide an evidential reading, this was examined and contained 108 milligrams of alcohol within 100 millilitres of blood. This being over the legal limit of 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

On 22nd July 2021, Mr Sweeney attended Leeds Magistrates Court where he pleaded guilty and was convicted of Driving a Motor Vehicle whilst Over the Prescribed Limit.

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Detective Constable (Name Not Disclosed)     –     Leicestershire Police, Constable

(Location unknown)

Alleged Breaches

  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct
  • Challenging and reporting improper conduct

The hearing is to be held in private.

A Leicestershire Police detective constable will face a gross misconduct hearing next week (19 to 21 January).

It is alleged that in February 2021, the conduct of the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and failing to challenge/report in respect of his dealings with a female colleague.

It is alleged that the officer had intimate and/or sexual relations with the colleague while on work premises and that he inappropriately engaged in sexual text conversation with her while on duty.

It is also alleged that on other occasions, while not on work premises, the officer was aware that his colleague was on duty when they had intimate and/or sexual relations and that the he failed to challenge and/or report his colleague’s on duty conduct.

Directions

It has been determined by the Chair of the hearing that it should be heard in private under regulation 39 of the Police Conduct Regulations 2020. Representations can be made from the public and the press as to why this hearing, or part of this hearing, should be held in public.

Application to Attend

Any representations should be sent to Hearing.Officer@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk by 4pm on Friday 7 January.

Fri 21st January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

Special Inspector Ash Harris     –     Bedfordshire Police, Inspector

Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, Bedford MK45 9AZ

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

Whilst on on duty, Special Inspector Ash Harris is alleged to have made a number of sexualised comments to junior members of his team. He is also alleged to have inappropriately touched another junior ranking officer whilst on duty on more than one occasion.

Fri 21st January 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Simon Albutt     –     West Mercia Police, Former Officer

Worcester

Alleged Breaches

  • Confidentiality

The hearing is to be held in public.

No further information has been provided by the force into the circumstances of the alleged breaches.

Mon 24th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Mon 24th January 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Joynal Ahmed     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Constable

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

PC Joynal Ahmed, based at the Crime Recording Investigation Bureau, will answer allegations that his conduct amounted to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of:

It is alleged that, on 7 October 2020 PC Joynal Ahmed assaulted his partner Ms X by punching her in the face, kicking her in the back, choking her by applying force around her neck and making threats to stab and kill her.

Directions

The Chair has put in place reporting restrictions in relation to the identity of the complainant and determined that screens will be used during her evidence.

Mon 24th January 2022, 11:30am

View on Misconduct 999

former PC Dilraj Singh     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Former Officer

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 25 August 2021 at Willesden Magistrates’ Court, former PC Singh was convicted of having driven a motor vehicle after consuming so much alcohol that the proportion of it in his breath exceeded the prescribed limit. The conviction related to an offence committed on 20 March 2021.

Former PC Singh was disqualified from driving for 24 months and given a four-week curfew (with electronic monitoring). He was ordered to pay Crown Prosecution Service costs of £650 and a victim surcharge of £95.

At the material time, PC Singh was a serving police officer with the Metropolitan Police Service.

Mon 24th January 2022, 11:30am

View on Misconduct 999

DI Neil Corbel     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Former Officer

Piazza, Hearings Suite, Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6 1TR

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in private.

On the 24th January 2020, a report was made to police of potential Voyeurism offences.

Following the initial police, investigation police identified former DI Neil Corbel as a suspect.

On the 21st February, 2020 former DI Corbel was interviewed by police. During the interview, former DI Corbel admitted to recording the initial victim without her consent. Former DI Corbel also admitted to a number of other occasions where he had committed Voyeurism offences.

On the 13th September 2021, former DI Corbel attended Westminster Magistrates Court and pleaded guilty to 19 counts of Voyeurism.

Tue 25th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Tue 25th January 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Joynal Ahmed     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Constable

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

PC Joynal Ahmed, based at the Crime Recording Investigation Bureau, will answer allegations that his conduct amounted to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of:

It is alleged that, on 7 October 2020 PC Joynal Ahmed assaulted his partner Ms X by punching her in the face, kicking her in the back, choking her by applying force around her neck and making threats to stab and kill her.

Directions

The Chair has put in place reporting restrictions in relation to the identity of the complainant and determined that screens will be used during her evidence.

Wed 26th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Wed 26th January 2022, 9:30am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Joynal Ahmed     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Constable

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6, London

Alleged Breaches

  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

PC Joynal Ahmed, based at the Crime Recording Investigation Bureau, will answer allegations that his conduct amounted to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of:

It is alleged that, on 7 October 2020 PC Joynal Ahmed assaulted his partner Ms X by punching her in the face, kicking her in the back, choking her by applying force around her neck and making threats to stab and kill her.

Directions

The Chair has put in place reporting restrictions in relation to the identity of the complainant and determined that screens will be used during her evidence.

Thu 27th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Fri 28th January 2022, (time not published)

View on Misconduct 999

PC Ben Pecorini, PC Myles Mykoo, Former PC Sarah Joesbury     –     Thames Valley Police, Constable

Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters Kidlington

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Use of force
  • Orders and instructions
  • Duties and responsibilities
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

between Monday 17 January and Friday 28 January 2022 at Thames Valley Police’s Headquarters in Kidlington in front of legally qualified chairperson, Mr John Bassett. This is subject to any government changes in respect of Covid-19.

The hearing relates to Police Constables Ben Pecorini and Myles Mykoo and former Police Constable Sarah Joesbury.

It is in connection with incidents on 18 March 2019 when PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury were off-duty and socialising with other off-duty colleagues in central London.

It is alleged that during a train journey, PC Pecorini and PC Joesbury began dancing in a sexualised manner and another passenger; ‘Mr A’ began filming this.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury spoke to Mr A and then a confrontation took place, during which force was used and injuries were caused.

It is alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury used their warrant cards to travel on the train, rather than obtaining a ticket.

The agreement with the rail company is that police officers may use their warrant cards to travel without a ticket, but will be expected to provide help and assistance if an incident occurs during the journey.

It is alleged that the three officers were too intoxicated to provide meaningful help and that using their warrant cards to travel free of charge breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury behaved in a disorderly manner on the train, engaging in noisy and drunken behaviour, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is also alleged that PC Pecorini and former PC Joesbury engaged in sexualised and inappropriate dancing on the train, in breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
It is further alleged that PC Pecorini, PC Mykoo and former PC Joesbury confronted the passenger in a loud, aggressive and/or physical manner, in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.
It is finally alleged that PC Pecorini used unreasonable force on Mr A when he struck him in the face with his elbow, in breach of the Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Use of Force and Discreditable Conduct paragraphs of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

 

Directions

In order to comply with health and safety guidelines currently in place at Thames Valley Police Headquarters as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the interests of transparency, the only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media (limited to six on any one day) subject to the following conditions:

The only members of the public permitted to attend the hearing are accredited members of the media;
Accredited members of the media may only attend the hearing by means of video link;
The maximum number of accredited members of the hearing who may attend the hearing on any one day is six;
The taking of photographs and the use of film or sound recording equipment during the hearing, except for official use by TVP, is prohibited;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must produce valid identification if required to do so;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link must notify the Appropriate Authority of the location from which he/she is viewing the hearing and notify the Appropriate Authority of any change of location during the course of the hearing;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link shall not share the link or facilitate access to the live stream to anyone else;
Any accredited member of the media must adhere to reporting restrictions as directed by the Legally Qualified Chair;
There is to be no live Tweeting or live use of social media during proceedings;
Any accredited member of the media attending the hearing by the video conference link acknowledges that the link may be terminated in the event that the Appropriate Authority reasonably believes that he/she is in breach of these conditions;

Application to Attend

Any accredited member of the media wishing to attend by the video link must give notice thereof, confirming his/her agreement to these conditions when making their application, which must be received by midday on Thursday 13 January 2022. Link for application to apply to attend.

Tue 1st February 2022, 10:00am

View on Misconduct 999

PC Richard Pearce     –     Metropolitan Police Service, Constable

Empress State Building, Lillie Road, SW6 1TR

Alleged Breaches

  • Authority, respect and courtesy
  • Equality and diversity
  • Conduct

The hearing is to be held in public.

On 3 February 2020, PC Pearce is alleged to have shared a post on social media that could reasonably be perceived to be offensive and discriminatory.

On 31 July 2020, PC Pearce is alleged to have shared a second post on social media that could reasonably be perceived to be offensive and discriminatory.

PC Pearce is further alleged to have been threatening and hostile to another that complained about the comments being offensive.

Share this story
Published
Categorised as Mailings

An investigative news agency that uncovers agenda-setting stories from across the UK